首页> 外文OA文献 >Use of dependency and prioritization\ud tools by clinical nurse specialists in\ud palliative care: an exploratory study
【2h】

Use of dependency and prioritization\ud tools by clinical nurse specialists in\ud palliative care: an exploratory study

机译:依赖性和优先级的使用\ ud 临床护士专家在\ ud中使用的工具 姑息治疗:探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs\udassessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care\udservices. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving\udspecialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess\udthe predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing\udand measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS)\udperspective. Method: In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed\udthe Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month\udperiod (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007)\udor the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a\udfocus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants\udexplored the perceived utility of all three tools. Results: The Vale\udprioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient\udneed and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal\uddifferences between the two dependency tools, neither of which\udpredicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2:\uddifficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the\udtwo dependency tools, and workload concerns. Conclusion: While the\udVale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise\udquestions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds\udof tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research\udis needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate,\udsetting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.
机译:目的:主要目的是评估三种需求\评估/依赖工具在基于社区的姑息治疗\ udservices中的效用。具体目标是评估使用这些工具接受\专业姑息治疗社区护理的患者样本,评估\每种工具的预测能力,以及探索优先\评估和衡量来自临床护士专家(CNS)的患者依赖性的效用\透视。方法:在第1阶段中,为三个月\ upperiod(n = 162)内所有就诊的患者完成了22种基于社区的CNS评估。每次访问后,他们还完成了Graves和Payne(2007)\或Birch等(1997)的依赖工具。在第2阶段,\焦点小组(n = 8)和与CNS参与者进行的两次一对一访谈\ ud探索了所有这三种工具的感知效用。结果:Vale \ udprioritization工具似乎是最有用的,它可以优先考虑患者的\ neuding和管理工作量。统计分析突出显示了两个依赖工具之间的最小差异,两者都不是预测访问的时间。从阶段2:日常管理的困难,依赖工具之间的分歧点和工作量问题中确定了三个主题。结论:虽然udVale优先排序工具是最有用的工具,但研究结果对这些以社区为基础的姑息治疗患者的工具的整体实用性和实用性提出了质疑。进一步的研究需要识别/开发,改编和评估适用于此人群的适当的\ udsetting依赖工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号